<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/293" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/293</id>
  <updated>2013-05-18T11:22:54Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-18T11:22:54Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Expert evidence in the digital age in Australia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77796" />
    <author>
      <name>Wilson, Nigel Ian Cameron</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77796</id>
    <updated>2013-05-16T02:30:06Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Expert evidence in the digital age in Australia
Author: Wilson, Nigel Ian Cameron</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reflections on I just didn't do it, the lay judge system, and legal education in and out of Japan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77728" />
    <author>
      <name>Anderson, Kent</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77728</id>
    <updated>2013-05-15T00:30:17Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Reflections on I just didn't do it, the lay judge system, and legal education in and out of Japan
Author: Anderson, Kent
Abstract: In 2007 the Academy Award winning director of Shall We Dance released his new film, a  critique of the Japanese criminal justice system from a wrongful conviction perspective. In this  article, I use the film as a vehicle to serve three disparate goals. First, I provide the first legal critique  of the film, a genre of legal scholarship developing over the past 15 years. Second, I use the film to reflect on criminal justice reforms in Japan, in particular the introduction of the Lay Judge System  (quasi-jury saiban-in seido) from 2009. Third, I critically ask whether use of film as a legal text  assists or distracts from my primary pedagogical objectives in teaching comparative Japanese law.  I conclude with a cautious recommendation of I Just Didn’t Do It as legal cinema, as a catalyst for  reform of the Japanese criminal justice system and as an educational text.
Description: Extent: 21 p.</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Griefing, massacres, discrimination, and art: the limits of overlapping rule sets in online games</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77704" />
    <author>
      <name>Humphreys, Sal</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>de Zwart, Melissa June</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77704</id>
    <updated>2013-05-14T03:30:11Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Griefing, massacres, discrimination, and art: the limits of overlapping rule sets in online games
Author: Humphreys, Sal; de Zwart, Melissa June</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sovereignty: frontiers of Possibility</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77517" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77517</id>
    <updated>2013-05-08T00:30:20Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Sovereignty: frontiers of Possibility
Editor: Evans, Julie; Genovese, Ann; Reilly, Alexander Peter; Wolfe, Patrick</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

