<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/16353">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/16353</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/78186" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/75555" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74337" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74336" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-06-20T02:46:10Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/78186">
    <title>Hub Central: utilising co-created ‘space design’ to produce peer interaction across diverse student groups</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/78186</link>
    <description>Title: Hub Central: utilising co-created ‘space design’ to produce peer interaction across diverse student groups
Author: Reberger, Hedley
Abstract: Planning interaction between students needs to start as part of the space design. The University of Adelaide opened ‘Hub Central’ in September 2011. A 42 million dollar project co-created with students has seen an area of 10,500 square metres that has built its own unique community that embraces diverse interaction. Staff working with international students have been socially engineering opportunities or creating ‘programs’ that aim to foster interaction between diverse groups for years. Experience shows that these programs often support interaction between a diverse range of international students but are not so successful in promoting interaction between international and domestic students. A new approach has been used at Hub Central. Students were used in the co-creation of a space that has been designed to promote academic achievement by enhancing the student experience. By reflecting on their own needs, roles and contributions, a space has been delivered that is multifunctional, allows repurposing and fosters students developing their own approaches to interaction. A space largely with a philosophy of self management by students and filled with staff that are student centric has resulted in a community with an overall heightened sense of awareness and empathy towards the goals of their peers. Hub Central is the complete package as a student space. The Hub includes 11 bookable student project rooms, 13 student projects booths, 290 fixed student computers, training rooms, Wi-Fi, a student kitchen, 3 commercial food outlets, a general store, the Maths and Writing Centres and Student and IT Support Services operating extended hours (8am to 10pm weekdays, 10am to 5pm weekends).   The collocation of all this has provided a greater feeling of belonging and encouraged the students to interact in diverse groups beyond the classroom. The paper aims to provide real world examples of how ‘space’ can be designed and utilised for enhancing student support services and interaction between all students, staff and community.</description>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/75555">
    <title>Blended learning approaches to practical teaching in pharmacology: the best of both worlds?</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/75555</link>
    <description>Title: Blended learning approaches to practical teaching in pharmacology: the best of both worlds?
Author: Smid, Scott; Salem, Abdallah Mohamed; Musgrave, Ian Francis
Abstract: Third year Pharmacology courses are offered in various Sciences programs with a compulsory assessable practicum, which reinforces teaching and learning objectives of lecture material while also introducing students to a range of research skills in experimental design, methods, analysis and reporting. These so-called ‘wet labs’ use conventional discipline-specific methodologies to investigate the effects of drugs directly on biological systems. These are highly valued by students as reported by consistent course evaluations indicating not only their value in reinforcing lecture theory, but also fostering further engagement in research methods. Budgetary and class size constraints associated with conventional wet lab practicals and noted limitations in computer simulation-based practicals (Hughes, 2001) necessitate further innovation in wet lab practical delivery in pharmacology.&#xD;
While students are often enthusiastic about practical classes in pharmacology, they also express being overwhelmed by the range of new techniques and practical skills they have to acquire quickly in order to be successful. This includes a familiarity with new experimental equipment, data acquisition and management software and graphical and statistical software for data analysis and reporting. Much of the specialised hardware and software is only accessible in the&#xD;
laboratory setting and it is difficult to therefore prepare students in advance of the practical class. There exists a need to better integrate the data acquisition, analysis and interpretive software in a way that can be utilised (i) in an incremental and staged manner and (ii) in a formative setting during the laboratory class.&#xD;
In this University-funded project we sought to integrate proprietary instructional practical software applications (LabTutor, ADInstruments®) into custom-designed practical sessions (via LabAuthor). Students worked in small groups generating biological data from conventional in vitro isolated tissue apparatus that was transmitted from each group’s laptop computer via wireless signal to a central LabTutor client server. Practical implementation was performed as a series of sequential tasks managed via LabTutor software, with pop-up help boxes that describe how the equipment, computer hardware and software operate while enabling students to generate biological data via discrete prompts at each step.&#xD;
At the completion of the practical, students could access their data file in the 'central server' for later online submission and reporting. Students therefore had the capacity for data analysis and reporting in a more flexible environment. This also had the advantage of the capacity for the provision of online assessment and feedback of practical reports. Student feedback suggested this had the potential to be a more intuitive, step-wise approach to discipline-specific learning, enhancing student engagement in practical classes while utilising the pedagogic advantages of the interactive online material (Bonakdarian et al., 2010). This blended approach of traditional and innovative techniques is readily adaptable for use in other compatible disciplines utilising similar in vitro methodologies in practicum delivery.</description>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T14:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74337">
    <title>Report on Student Evaluation of ALL Writing Centre: Semester 1, 2010</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74337</link>
    <description>Title: Report on Student Evaluation of ALL Writing Centre: Semester 1, 2010
Description: Extent: 8p.; Academic Learning and Language (ALL), August 2010</description>
    <dc:date>2009-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74336">
    <title>Report on Student Evaluation of ALL Writing Centre: Semester 2, 2009</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/74336</link>
    <description>Title: Report on Student Evaluation of ALL Writing Centre: Semester 2, 2009
Description: Extent: 6p.; Academic Learning and Language (ALL), December 2009</description>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

