<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Philosophy Publications</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/15970</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Eating Meat and Reading Diamond</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53620</link>
      <description>Title: Eating Meat and Reading Diamond
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author: Gleeson, Andrew Hampton
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Here is a very common philosophical opinion: being human plays no
important role in moral thinking. Call this the anti-humanist thesis. I
argue that a thirty-year old paper by Cora Diamond, ‘Eating Meat and
Eating People' (‘EMEP') can help us to see that the anti-humanist thesis is false.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The ethics of Community Empowerment: tensions in health promotion theory and practice</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53619</link>
      <description>Title: The ethics of Community Empowerment: tensions in health promotion theory and practice
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author: Braunack-Mayer, Annette Joy; Louise, Jennie
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The concepts of community participation, empowerment and capacity building are central tenets of contemporary health promotion theory. They reflect the view that health and well-being are shaped by a wide range of social, economic, political and organisational forces that are outside the control of individuals. 

Despite its theoretical appeal, the practice of Community Empowerment is ethically contentious and can produce ethical dilemmas for health promotion practitioners. In this paper we relate these dilemmas to theoretical considerations, and argue that the empowerment of communities should be understood as a means rather than an end . This leads us to argue for the adoption of what we call a Reflective Equilibrium Community Empowerment approach, which draws on both "top—down" and "bottom—up" methods to help resolve the ethical tensions in health promotion programmes
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Description: Copyright © 2008 by International Union for Health Promotion and Education</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The romantic spirit</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53568</link>
      <description>Title: The romantic spirit
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author: McMahon, Jennifer Anne</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backing Kant, with interest</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/53567</link>
      <description>Title: Backing Kant, with interest
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Author: McMahon, Jennifer Anne</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

