<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/17679</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:22:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T12:22:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use of a damped Hertz contact model to represent head impact safety tests</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77812</link>
      <description>Title: Use of a damped Hertz contact model to represent head impact safety tests
Author: Searson, Daniel Jeffrey; Anderson, Robert William Gerard; Hutchinson, Timothy Paul
Abstract: Head impacts tests are conducted as part of many types of safety testing, with applications including vehicle crashes, helmets and sports surfaces. A common measure of head injury in these tests is the Head Injury Criterion (HIC), which is calculated from the measured acceleration of a headform during the impact. In this paper, these headform impacts are represented by a Hertz contact model to which a damping term has been added. A power law relationship was found to be appropriate for modelling the effect of headform mass and impact speed on HIC and peak displacement. It was found that the stiffness and damping in the model did not affect the exponents in the power law, but the exponent of displacement in the contact model did have an effect on all of the exponents in the power law. This result may explain why some variation exists in real data. The relationships presented in this paper may be used to predict how the HIC and maximum displacement of the head will vary for a given change in head mass or impact speed. This has applications in test protocol development and for evaluating the safety performance of tested structures under a variety of real world conditions.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77812</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing in order to measure the protection against impact of people, manufactured items, and agricultural produce: How to consider all severities of shock</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77811</link>
      <description>Title: Testing in order to measure the protection against impact of people, manufactured items, and agricultural produce: How to consider all severities of shock
Author: Hutchinson, Timothy Paul; Anderson, Robert William Gerard; Searson, Daniel Jeffrey</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77811</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In vivo biomechanical response of ovine heads to shaken baby syndrome events</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77444</link>
      <description>Title: In vivo biomechanical response of ovine heads to shaken baby syndrome events
Author: Sandoz, Baptiste; Dutschke, Jeffrey Kym; Liu, Q.; Manavis, Jim; Finnie, John Walker; Vink, Robert; Anderson, Robert William Gerard</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77444</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Risky behaviours: preferable to crashes for evaluating road safety mass media campaigns?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77179</link>
      <description>Title: Risky behaviours: preferable to crashes for evaluating road safety mass media campaigns?
Author: Wundersitz, Lisa Narelle; Hutchinson, Timothy Paul
Abstract: Decades of research have failed to establish whether or not mass media advertising can reduce road crashes. The probable reason is that the random variability in crash numbers is too great (and, campaigns being very cheap per person reached, even low effectiveness may be enough to be worthwhile). Three alternatives to before-after comparison of crashes as the method of determining effectiveness of an intervention are discussed. These are real-world experiments of high methodological quality, laboratory experiments of the social psychological type, and the measurement of safety-related behaviors. The third of these, before-after comparison of behaviors or variables that can be objectively observed and are closely linked to safety, is suggested as the most promising. However, the behaviors that might plausibly be used as proxies for crashes are quite few in number, and there is an urgent research need to find more of them, together with theory implying that a change in the behavior does indeed mean a change in safety.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2440/77179</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-12-31T13:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

