|
Adelaide Research and Scholarship
:
Schools and Disciplines
:
School of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Urban Design
:
Architecture Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/29069
|
| Type: | Conference paper |
| Title: | Evaluating the industrial potential of digital outsourcing in architecture: Methodological challenges and choices |
| Author: | Tombesi, Paolo Bharat, Dave Gardiner, Blair Scriver, Peter Carleton |
| Citation: | 'Designing Value: New Directions in Architectural Management' : Proceedings of the CIB W096 Architectural Management 'Special Meeting', 2-4 November, 2005 / Stephen Emmitt and Matthijs Prins (eds.): pp.441-450 |
| Publisher: | CIB |
| Issue Date: | 2005 |
| ISBN: | 8778771900
 |
| Conference Name: | CIB W096 Architectural Management 'Special Meeting' on 'Designing Value: New Directions in Architectural Management' (2005 : Lyngby, Denmark) |
| School/Discipline: | School of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Urban Design |
| Abstract: | This paper is the first product of a two-year research program sponsored by the Australian
Research Council in 2005. The project seeks to evaluate the industrial potential of distant
collaborations between architectural firms, and assess the likelihood that such practice will
develop into a fully-fledged mode of service delivery. In order to achieve these two objectives,
the research was set out to answer three main questions. (1) What are the quantifiable advantages
and drawbacks of offshore collaborations for Australian firms? Do they change according to the
socio-technical characteristics of collaborating offices? (2) To what degree do professional and
cultural elements affect the performance of firms engaged in the digital supply of architecturerelated
services? (3) Is there a way to quantify the cost of the transactions involved in distant
collaborations, and use these costs as indicators of future geographic shifts in the procurement of
design services? In the initial stage of the project, however, the main intellectual challenge was
analytical. It concerned the organisation of a system of technical tests and design tasks that did
justice to the complexity of the design process and the skills required to carry it out properly,
whilst helping the researchers assess workforce performance and collaboration costs. Strategies
adopted in selecting the sample of participating firms, and the choices the authors had to make in
structuring ad-hoc pilots in order to collect meaningful and generalisable data are reviewed. |
| Keywords: | Architectural practice; culture; distant collaboration; outsourcing; strategies |
| RMID: | 0020051754 |
| Published version: | http://www.irbdirekt.de/daten/iconda/CIB5522.pdf |
Links to content (authorised users): | Check full text options |
| Appears in Collections: | Architecture Publications
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|