Adelaide Research and Scholarship
Research Centres and Institutes
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type: ||Journal article|
|Title: ||Using DNA from museum specimens to preserve the integrity of evolutionary significant unit boundaries in threatened species|
|Author: ||Paplinska, Justyna Zofia|
Taggart, David Augustine
Eldridge, Mark David B.
Austin, Jeremy James
|Citation: ||Biological Conservation, 2011; 144(1): 290-297|
|Issue Date: ||2011|
|School/Discipline: ||School of Earth and Environmental Sciences|
|Justyna Zofia Paplinska, David A. Taggart, Tony Corrigan, Mark D.B. Eldridge and Jeremy J. Austin|
|Abstract: ||Use of DNA from museum samples is a powerful tool to directly establish historical ESU boundaries in areas where populations of a species have been extirpated. The brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) has suffered extensive reductions in range and population size since European settlement in Australia. Populations of this species have been grouped into three putative evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) which were likely once contiguous along the south-east coast of Australia. However, there is currently a gap of ∼320 km between extant populations of the southern and central ESUs. Conservation plans for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby include re-introductions of animals to locations within their former range. In order to preserve the historic geographic integrity of the genetic lineages within the species, it is necessary to map the boundary between the southern ESU and central ESU to allow more informed management decisions about which lineages should be used to re-stock specific geographic locations. We have extracted DNA from samples from museum specimens that come from locations between the southernmost extant colony of the central ESU and the remaining wild colony of the southern ESU. We sequenced a 177 bp interval of the left domain of the mitochondrial DNA control region and used phylogenetic analysis to group obtained sequences with previously published sequences belonging to the three ESUs. We have extended the range of the central ESU southwards and the range of the southern ESU northwards such that the gap between the ESUs is now approximately 160 km. We recommend that, where suitable historical museum collections exist, this technique be incorporated into re-introduction plans for other threatened species.|
|Keywords: ||Evolutionarily significant units; Petrogale penicillata; macropodid; marsupial; ancient DNA; conservation genetics|
|Rights: ||© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Environment Institute Leaders|
|View citing articles in: ||Google Scholar|
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.