|
Adelaide Research and Scholarship
:
Schools and Disciplines
:
School of Population Health & Clinical Practice
:
Public Health
:
Public Health Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2440/73473
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | A model-based evaluation of collaborative care in management of patients with type 2 diabetes in Australia: an initial report |
| Author: | Hajiali Afzali, Hossein Karnon, Jonathan Daniel Gray, Jodi Patricia Beilby, Justin John |
| Citation: | Australian Health Review, 2012; 36(3):258-263 |
| Publisher: | Australian Healthcare Association |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| ISSN: | 0156-5788 |
| School/Discipline: | School of Population Health and Clinical Practice : Public Health |
Statement of Responsibility: | Hossein Haji Ali Afzali, Jonathan Karnon, Jodi Gray and Justin Beilby |
| Abstract: | OBJECTIVES: To analyse the short- and long-term costs and benefits of alternative models of primary care for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes in Australia. The models of care reflect differential uptake of primary care-based incentive programs, including reminder systems and involvement of practice nurses in management. This paper describes our study protocol and its progress. METHODS: We are undertaking an observational study using a cluster sample design that links retrospective patient data from a range of sources to estimate costs and intermediate outcomes (such as the level of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)) over a 3-year time horizon.Weuse the short-term data as a basis to estimate lifetime costs and benefits of alternative models of care using a decision analytic model. INITIAL REPORT: We recruited 15 practices from a metropolitan area (Adelaide) and allocated them to three models of care. Three hundred and ninety-nine patients agreed to participate. We use multilevel analysis to evaluate the association between different models of care and patient-level outcomes, while controlling for several covariates. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Given the large amount of funding currently used to maintain primary care-based incentives in general practices in Australia, the results of this study generate the knowledge required to promote investment in the most cost-effective incentives. |
| Rights: | © AHHA 2012 |
| RMID: | 0020121819 |
| DOI: | 10.1071/AH11084 |
| Appears in Collections: | Public Health Publications
|
| View citing articles in: | Google Scholar Scopus
|
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|