Adelaide Research and Scholarship
Schools and Disciplines
School of Population Health & Clinical Practice
Public Health Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type: ||Journal article|
|Title: ||How effective are programs at managing transition from hospital to home? A case study of the Australian transition care program|
|Author: ||Gray, Leonard C.|
Peel, Nancye M.
Kurrle, Susan E.
Giles, Lynne Catherine
Cameron, Ian D.
|Citation: ||BMC Geriatrics, 2012; 12:6|
|Publisher: ||BioMed Central Ltd.|
|Issue Date: ||2012|
|School/Discipline: ||School of Population Health and Clinical Practice : Public Health|
|Leonard C Gray, Nancye M Peel, Maria Crotty, Susan E Kurrle, Lynne C Giles, and Ian D Cameron|
|Abstract: ||Background: An increasing demand for acute care services due in part to rising proportions of older people and increasing rates of chronic diseases has led to new models of post-acute care for older people that offer coordinated discharge, ongoing support and often a focus on functional restoration. Overall, review of the literature suggests there is considerable uncertainty around the effectiveness and resource implications of the various model configurations and delivery approaches. In this paper, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of such programs, using the Australian Transition Care Program as a case study. Discussion: The Australian Transition Care Program was established at the interface of the acute and aged care sectors with particular emphasis on transitions between acute and community care. The program is intended to enable a significant proportion of care recipients to return home, rather than prematurely enter residential aged care, optimize their functional capacity, and reduce inappropriate extended lengths of hospital stay for older people. Broadly, the model is configured and targeted in accordance with programs reported in the international literature to be effective. Early evaluations suggest good acceptance of the program by hospitals, patients and staff. Ultimately, however, the program's place in the array of post-acute services should be determined by its demonstrated efficacy relative to other services which cater for similar patient groups. Summary: Currently there is a lack of robust evaluation to provide convincing evidence of efficacy, either from a patient outcome or cost reduction perspective. As the program expands and matures, there will be opportunity to scrutinise the systematic effects, with lessons for both Australian and international policy makers and clinical leaders.|
|Description: ||Extent: 5p.|
|Rights: ||© 2012 Gray et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.|
|Appears in Collections:||Public Health Publications|
|View citing articles in: ||Google Scholar|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.