Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81876
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Does the shoe fit? Real versus imagined ecological footprints
Author: Blomqvist, L.
Brook, B.
Ellis, E.
Kareiva, P.
Nordhaus, T.
Shellenberger, M.
Citation: PLoS Biology, 2013; 11(11):1-6
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1544-9173
1545-7885
Editor: Mace, G.M.
Organisation: Environment Institute
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberger
Abstract: The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective.
Keywords: Humans
Conservation of Energy Resources
United Nations
Guidelines as Topic
Ecological and Environmental Phenomena
Carbon Footprint
Environmental Policy
Rights: © 2013 Blomqvist et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Environment Institute Leaders publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_81876.pdfPublished version274.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.