Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/100409
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLong, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMark-Kurik, E.en
dc.contributor.authorJohanson, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorLee, M.en
dc.contributor.authorYoung, G.en
dc.contributor.authorMin, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorAhlberg, P.en
dc.contributor.authorNewman, M.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, R.en
dc.contributor.authorBlaauwen, J.en
dc.contributor.authorChoo, B.en
dc.contributor.authorTrinajstic, K.en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationNature, 2015; 517(7533):196-U171en
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836en
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/100409-
dc.description.abstractReproduction in jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) involves either external or internal fertilization. It is commonly argued that internal fertilization can evolve from external, but not the reverse. Male copulatory claspers are present in certain placoderms, fossil jawed vertebrates retrieved as a paraphyletic segment of the gnathostome stem group in recent studies. This suggests that internal fertilization could be primitive for gnathostomes, but such a conclusion depends on demonstrating that copulation was not just a specialized feature of certain placoderm subgroups. The reproductive biology of antiarchs, consistently identified as the least crownward placoderms and thus of great interest in this context, has until now remained unknown. Here we show that certain antiarchs possessed dermal claspers in the males, while females bore paired dermal plates inferred to have facilitated copulation. These structures are not associated with pelvic fins. The clasper morphology resembles that of ptyctodonts, a more crownward placoderm group, suggesting that all placoderm claspers are homologous and that internal fertilization characterized all placoderms. This implies that external fertilization and spawning, which characterize most extant aquatic gnathostomes, must be derived from internal fertilization, even though this transformation has been thought implausible. Alternatively, the substantial morphological evidence for placoderm paraphyly must be rejected.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJohn A. Long, Elga Mark-Kurik, Zerina Johanson, Michael S. Y. Lee, Gavin C. Young, Zhu Min, Per E. Ahlberg, Michael Newman, Roger Jones, Jan den Blaauwen, Brian Choo and Kate Trinajsticen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen
dc.rights© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserveden
dc.subjectFertilizationen
dc.titleCopulation in antiarch placoderms and the origin of gnathostome internal fertilizationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030019871en
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/nature13825en
dc.identifier.pubid147039-
pubs.library.collectionGenetics publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Genetics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.