Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/101049
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, K.-
dc.contributor.authorPring, A.-
dc.contributor.authorEtschmann, B.-
dc.contributor.authorMacmillan, E.-
dc.contributor.authorNgothai, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, B.-
dc.contributor.authorHooker, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMosselmans, F.-
dc.contributor.authorBrugger, J.-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Mineralogist: an international journal of earth and planetary materials, 2015; 100(8-9):1728-1735-
dc.identifier.issn0003-004X-
dc.identifier.issn1945-3027-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/101049-
dc.description.abstractInterface coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reactions (ICDR) are a common feature of fluid-rock interaction during crustal fluid flow. We tested the hypothesis that ICDR reactions can play a key role in scavenging minor elements by exploring the fate of U during the experimental sulfidation of hematite to chalcopyrite under hydrothermal conditions (220–300 °C). The experiments where U was added, either as solid UO2+x(s) or as a soluble uranyl complex, differed from the U-free experiments in that pyrite precipitated initially, before the onset of chalcopyrite precipitation. In addition, in UO2+x(s)-bearing experiments, enhanced hematite dissolution led to increased porosity and precipitation of pyrite+magnetite within the hematite core, whereas in uranyl nitrate-bearing experiments, abundant pyrite formed initially, before being replaced by chalcopyrite. Uranium scavenging was mainly associated with the early reaction stage (pyrite precipitation), resulting in a thin U-rich line marking the original hematite grain surface. This “line” consists of nanocrystals of UO2+x(s), based on chemical mapping and XANES spectroscopy. This study shows that the presence of minor components can affect the pathway of ICDR reactions. Reactions between U- and Cu-bearing fluids and hematite can explain the Cu-U association prominent in some iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKan Li, Allan Pring, Barbara Etschmann, Edeltraud Macmillan, Yung Ngothai, Brian O, Neill, Anthony Hooker, Fred Mosselmans, Joël Brugger-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMineralogical Society of America-
dc.rights© 2015 Mineralogical Society of America-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5125-
dc.subjectUranium; scavenging; IOCG deposits; experiment; sulfidation reaction; interface coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reactions-
dc.titleUranium scavenging during mineral replacement reactions-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.2138/am-2015-5125-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP1095069-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidNgothai, Y. [0000-0002-0199-4225]-
dc.identifier.orcidHooker, A. [0000-0003-2324-4748]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Chemical Engineering publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.