Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/101261
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcNevin, D.en
dc.contributor.authorEdson, J.en
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, J.en
dc.contributor.authorAustin, J.en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationForensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 2015; 11(3):326-338en
dc.identifier.issn1547-769Xen
dc.identifier.issn1556-2891en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/101261-
dc.description.abstractThe primary method for analysis of low template DNA (LTDNA) is known as the low copy number (LCN) method involving an increased number of PCR cycles (typically 34). In common with other LTDNA methods, LCN profiles are characterized by allelic imbalance, drop in, and drop out that require complicated interpretation rules. They often require replicate PCR reactions to generate a "consensus" profile in a specialized facility. An ideal method for analysis of LTDNA should enhance profiling outcomes without elevated error rates and be performed using standard facilities, with minimum additional cost.In this study, we present a comparison of four method variations for the amplification of STRs from LTDNA with a widely used, commercially available kit (AmpFℓSTR(®) Profiler Plus(®)): the standard method, the standard method with a post-PCR clean up, the LCN method, and a reduced reaction volume with increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration.Using telogen hairs-a common source of LTDNA-and matched reference DNA, the LCN method produced the highest number of concordant and non-concordant (i.e., dropped-in) alleles. In comparison, the reduced reaction volume with increased Taq polymerase yielded more full and concordant DNA profiles (all alleles combined) and less off-ladder alleles from a broad range of input DNA. In addition, this method resulted in less non-concordant alleles than LCN and no more than for standard PCR, which suggests that it may be preferred over increased PCR cycles for LTDNA analysis, either with or without consensus profiling and statistical modelling.Overall, this study highlights the importance and benefit of optimizing PCR conditions and developing improved laboratory methods to amplify and analyze LTDNA.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDennis McNevin, Janette Edson, James Robertson, Jeremy J. Austinen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHumana Pressen
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015en
dc.subjectLow template DNA (LTDNA); trace DNA; low copy number (LCN); Reduced volume PCR; short tandem repeat (STR)en
dc.titleReduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030031681en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12024-015-9679-3en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP0883333en
dc.identifier.pubid188155-
pubs.library.collectionGenetics publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidAustin, J. [0000-0003-4244-2942]en
Appears in Collections:Genetics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.