Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSaint, David Albert-
dc.contributor.advisorPamula, Yvonne-
dc.contributor.authorCoussens, Scott Wade-
dc.description.abstractAn examination of the nature of sleep fragmentation in children with upper airway obstruction. Introduction – Sleep related upper airway obstruction (UAO) in children disrupts breathing in sleep, resulting in sleep fragmentation and subsequent neurocognitive and behavioural deficits. Unfortunately the nature of this fragmentation in children is poorly understood and a universally accepted, clinically valid, measure of sleep fragmentation has been elusive. This limits our ability to accurately determine and measure the consequences of sleep fragmentation on a child’s development due to UAO, as well as the success of any treatment administered. General Aims - The aim of the current study was to (i) examine the nature of sleep fragmentation in children with upper airway obstruction and (ii) to develop a new sleep fragmentation index for use in paediatric clinical populations with upper airway obstruction. When this study began no such index existed that was widely accepted and utilized. A range of sleep fragmentation measures already trialed in children with upper airway obstruction were reviewed to identify problems and limitations with current and previous methods of measuring sleep fragmentation in these children. An attempt was also made to identify other possible additional factors that mediate sleep fragmentation so as to develop a workable and generally applicable sleep fragmentation index for children with upper airway obstruction. Methods – We performed a series of analyses on sleep and neurocognitive data from children with upper airway obstruction to identify and quantify neural activity associated with sleep fragmentation. We then used these measures and other mediating factors to create a composite measure of sleep fragmentation in children. Results – We found that children with upper airway obstruction had characteristically altered neural activity as measured by electroencephalogram (e.g. changes in sleep spindle density, decreased alpha and sigma power around spontaneous arousals from sleep). They also had an altered movement distribution in sleep (increased exponential distribution coefficient when sleep runs between movements are modeled on a survival curve), when compared to normal controls. The studies also demonstrated the potential ability of a composite measure of such sleep fragmentation markers and mediating vulnerability factors to more accurately and usefully quantify the negative impacts of upper airway obstruction. Conclusions - Sleep fragmentation is a significant consequence of UAO in children, however the current measure of UAO severity is insufficient for determining the overall impact on a child’s development. As this study demonstrates, the impact of sleep fragmentation is dependent on a complicated set of variables including: age, health factors (e.g. BMI), exposure time, disease severity (e.g. AHI), genetics, trait-like factors, social factors (e.g. SES) and family history. The arousals, or disruptions to sleep, are also altered in children with UAO compared to normal controls. We therefore propose a composite measure of these important factors as a more accurate tool for determining the impact of sleep fragmentation and overall severity of UAO in children.en
dc.subjectupper airways obstructionen
dc.subjectsleep fragmentationen
dc.titleAn examination of the nature of sleep fragmentation in children with upper airway obstructionen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Medicineen
dc.provenanceCopyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.en
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at:
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) (Research by Publication) -- University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, 2015.en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf933 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf2.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only369.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only3.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.