Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/103014
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Inter-rater reliability and validity of automated impedance manometry analysis and fluoroscopy in dysphagic patients after head and neck cancer radiotherapy
Author: Szczesniak, M.
Maclean, J.
Zhang, T.
Liu, R.
Cock, C.
Rommel, N.
Omari, T.
Cook, I.
Citation: Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2015; 27(8):1183-1189
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1350-1925
1365-2982
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Michal M. Szczesniak, J. Maclean, T. Zhang, R. Liu, C. Cock, N. Rommel, T. I. Omari and I. J. Cook
Abstract: Background: Pharyngeal automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis is a novel non-radiological method to analyze swallowing function based on impedance-pressure recordings. In dysphagic head and neck cancer patients, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the AIM-derived swallow risk index (SRI) and a novel measure of postswallow residue (iZn/Z) by comparing it against videofluoroscopy as the gold standard. Methods: Three blinded experts classified 88 videofluoroscopic swallows from 16 patients for aspiration and degree of postswallow residue. Pressure–impedance recordings of the patient and age-matched control swallows were analyzed using AIM by three observers who derived the SRI and iZn/Z. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for videofluoroscopic and AIM measures. Patient pressure/impedance measurements were compared with videofluoroscopy scores and control subjects to determine validity for detecting clinically relevant swallowing dysfunction. Key Results: Agreement among observers assessing presence of penetration and aspiration was modest (ICC 0.57) for videofluoroscopy and good (ICC 0.71, 0.82) for AIM-derived SRI and iZn/Z. When compared with age-matched controls, the SRI was higher in patients with aspiration (mean diff. 28.6, 95% CI [55.85, 1.355], p < 0.05). The iZn/Z had moderate positive correlation with bolus residue on fluoroscopy (BRS score) (rs(86) = 0.4120, p < 0.0001) and was increased in both patients with aspiration (∆244 [419.7, 69.52; p < 0.05]) and penetration (∆240 [394.3, 85.77]; p < 0.05) compared to controls. Conclusions & Inferences: AIM-based measures of swallowing function have better inter-rater reliability than comparable fluoroscopically derived measures. These measures are easily determined and objective markers of clinically relevant features of disordered swallowing following radiotherapy.
Keywords: Dysphagia; impedance; manometry; pharynx; reliability; videofluoroscopy
Rights: © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
RMID: 0030036612
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12610
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1046882
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.