Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/103014
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSzczesniak, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMaclean, J.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, T.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, R.-
dc.contributor.authorCock, C.-
dc.contributor.authorRommel, N.-
dc.contributor.authorOmari, T.-
dc.contributor.authorCook, I.-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationNeurogastroenterology and Motility, 2015; 27(8):1183-1189-
dc.identifier.issn1350-1925-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2982-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/103014-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pharyngeal automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis is a novel non-radiological method to analyze swallowing function based on impedance-pressure recordings. In dysphagic head and neck cancer patients, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the AIM-derived swallow risk index (SRI) and a novel measure of postswallow residue (iZn/Z) by comparing it against videofluoroscopy as the gold standard. Methods: Three blinded experts classified 88 videofluoroscopic swallows from 16 patients for aspiration and degree of postswallow residue. Pressure–impedance recordings of the patient and age-matched control swallows were analyzed using AIM by three observers who derived the SRI and iZn/Z. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for videofluoroscopic and AIM measures. Patient pressure/impedance measurements were compared with videofluoroscopy scores and control subjects to determine validity for detecting clinically relevant swallowing dysfunction. Key Results: Agreement among observers assessing presence of penetration and aspiration was modest (ICC 0.57) for videofluoroscopy and good (ICC 0.71, 0.82) for AIM-derived SRI and iZn/Z. When compared with age-matched controls, the SRI was higher in patients with aspiration (mean diff. 28.6, 95% CI [55.85, 1.355], p < 0.05). The iZn/Z had moderate positive correlation with bolus residue on fluoroscopy (BRS score) (rs(86) = 0.4120, p < 0.0001) and was increased in both patients with aspiration (∆244 [419.7, 69.52; p < 0.05]) and penetration (∆240 [394.3, 85.77]; p < 0.05) compared to controls. Conclusions & Inferences: AIM-based measures of swallowing function have better inter-rater reliability than comparable fluoroscopically derived measures. These measures are easily determined and objective markers of clinically relevant features of disordered swallowing following radiotherapy.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMichal M. Szczesniak, J. Maclean, T. Zhang, R. Liu, C. Cock, N. Rommel, T. I. Omari and I. J. Cook-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd-
dc.rights© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12610-
dc.subjectDysphagia; impedance; manometry; pharynx; reliability; videofluoroscopy-
dc.titleInter-rater reliability and validity of automated impedance manometry analysis and fluoroscopy in dysphagic patients after head and neck cancer radiotherapy-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nmo.12610-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1046882-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidOmari, T. [0000-0001-5108-7378]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.