Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/103157
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting |
Author: | Pearson, A. Jordan, Z. Lockwood, C. Aromataris, E. |
Citation: | International Journal of Nursing Practice, 2015; 21(5):670-676 |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Issue Date: | 2015 |
ISSN: | 1322-7114 1440-172X |
Statement of Responsibility: | Alan Pearson, Zoe Jordan, Craig Lockwood, Ed Aromataris |
Abstract: | The utility of qualitative research findings in the health sciences has been the subject of considerable debate, particularly with the advent of qualitative systematic reviews in recent years. There has been a significant investment in the production of guidance to improve the reporting of quantitative research; however, comparatively little time has been spent on developing the same for qualitative research reporting. This paper sets out to examine the possibility of developing a framework for refereed journals to utilize when guiding authors on how to report the results of qualitative studies in the hope that this will improve the quality of reports and subsequently their inclusion in qualitative syntheses and guidelines to inform practice at the point of care. |
Keywords: | evidence-based health; qualitative research; quality; reporting; standards |
Rights: | © 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
DOI: | 10.1111/ijn.12331 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12331 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Public Health publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.