Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Perianal abscess: a pilot study comparing packing with nonpacking of the abscess cavity|
|Citation:||Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2004; 47(9):1510-1514|
|Publisher:||Lippincott Williams & Wilkins|
|Darren M. Tonkin, Elizabeth Murphy, Mark Brooke-Smith, Paul Hollington, Nicholas Rieger, Simon Hockley, Nigel Richardson and David A. Wattchow|
|Abstract:||PURPOSE: Perianal sepsis is traditionally treated by incision and drainage, with packing of the residual cavity until healing. This study was designed to show that perianal abscess may be safely treated by incision and drainage alone. METHODS: Healing times, analgesic requirements, pain scores, abscess recurrence, and fistula rates were compared between two randomized groups treated with and without packing of perianal abscess cavities. RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited (7 lost to follow-up): 20 in the packing and 23 in the nonpacking arm. The groups were comparable in terms of age and gender distribution, type and size of abscess, and the presence of a fistula at operation. Mean healing times were similar (P = 0.214). The rate of abscess recurrence was similar (P = 0.61). Postoperative fistula rates were similar (P = 0.38). Pain scores at the first dressing change were similar (P = 0.296). Although pain scores appeared much reduced in the nonpacking arm, this did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study indicates that perianal abscesses can be managed safely without continued packing of the cavity without any obvious complications.|
|Description:||The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 2|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.