Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/104177
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Individual variability and predictors of driving simulator impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
Author: Vakulin, A.
Catcheside, P.
Baulk, S.
Antic, N.
Banks, S.
Dorrian, J.
McEvoy, R.
Citation: The Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2014; 10(6):647-655
Publisher: American Academy of Sleep Medicine
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 1550-9389
1550-9397
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Andrew Vakulin, Peter G. Catcheside, Stuart D. Baulk, Nick A. Antic, Siobhan Banks, Jillian Dorrian, R. Doug McEvoy
Abstract: Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with driving impairment and road crashes. However, daytime function varies widely between patients presenting a clinical challenge when assessing crash risk. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients showing "normal" versus "abnormal" driving simulator performance and examine whether anthropometric, clinical, and neurobehavioral measures predict abnormal driving. Methods: Thirty-eight OSA patients performed a 90-min simulated driving task under 3 conditions: normal sleep, restricted sleep (4 h in bed), and normal sleep + alcohol (BAC∼0.05 g/dL). Patients were classified as "resilient" drivers if, under all 3 experimental conditions their mean steering deviation fell within 2 standard deviations of the mean steering deviation of 20 controls driving under baseline normal sleep conditions, or a "vulnerable" driver if mean steering deviation was outside this range in at least one experimental condition. Potentially predictive baseline anthropometric, clinical, neurocognitive, and cortical activation measures were examined. Results: Of the 38 OSA patients examined, 23 (61%) and 15 (39%) were classified as resilient and vulnerable drivers, respectively. There were no differences in baseline measures between the groups, although the proportion of females was greater and self-reported weekly driving exposure was less among vulnerable drivers (p < 0.05). On univariate analysis gender, weekly driving hours, and auditory event related potential P2 amplitude were weakly associated with group status. Multivariate analysis showed weekly driving hours (OR 0.69, 95%CI, 0.51-0.94, p = 0.02) and P2 amplitude (OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.02-1.76, p = 0.035) independently predicted vulnerable drivers. Conclusions: Most OSA patients demonstrated normal simulated driving performance despite exposure to further sleep loss or alcohol. Most baseline measures did not differentiate between resilient and vulnerable drivers, although prior driving experience and cortical function were predictive. Novel measures to assist identification of OSA patients at risk of driving impairment and possibly accidents are needed. Trial Registration: Data presented in this manuscript was collected as part of a clinical trial "Experimental Investigations of Driving Impairment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea." Trial ID: ACTRN12610000009011, URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?ID=334979.
Keywords: Obstructive sleep apnea; driving performance; neurobehavioral function
Rights: Copyright status unknown
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.3792
Grant ID: NHMRC
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.