Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/10473
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review
Author: Merlin, T.
Scott, D.
Rao, M.
Wall, D.
Francis, D.
Bridgewater, F.
Maddern, G.
Citation: Transplantation, 2000; 70(12):1659-1666
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Issue Date: 2000
ISSN: 0041-1337
1534-6080
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Tracy L. Merlin; David F. Scott; M. Mohan Rao; Daryl R. Wall; David M. A. Francis; Franklin H. G. Bridgewater; and Guy J. Maddern
Abstract: Background. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the “gold” standard of open live donor nephrectomy. Methods. Search strategy: Three search strategies were devised to enable literature retrieval from the Medline, Current Contents, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up until, and including, February 2000. Study selection: Inclusion of a report was determined on the basis of a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by two reviewers, and a final consensus decision. English language reports were selected and acceptable study designs included randomized- controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, case series, or case reports. Each report was required to provide information on at least one of several safety and efficacy outcomes as detailed in the protocol. Data collection and analysis: Twenty-five reports met the inclusion criteria. They were tabulated and critically appraised in terms of the methodology and design, sample size, outcomes, and the possible influence of bias, confounding, and chance. Results. High level evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy was not available at the time of this review. Limited low level evidence suggested that the laparoscopic approach might be advantageous regarding the donor’s hospital stay, convalescence, pain, and resumption of employment. Conclusions. The ASERNIP-S Review Group concluded that the evidence-base for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy was inadequate to make a safety and efficacy recommendation. Clinical and research recommendations were developed regarding the introduction and current practice of this procedure in Australia.
Keywords: Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Kidney Transplantation; Nephrectomy; Safety; Graft Survival; Living Donors; Australia
Rights: © 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
RMID: 0001002014
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00001
Appears in Collections:Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.