Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/105014
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | McMahon, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Australasian Philosophical Review, 2017; 1(1):1-5 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2474-0500 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2474-0519 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/105014 | - |
dc.description.abstract | No matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility that has been overshadowed by aestheticians’ more visible concerns. Here I briefly survey relevant strands in the literature over the past century, before introducing themes covered in this inaugural issue of Australasian Philosophical Review. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Jennifer A. McMahon | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | - |
dc.rights | © 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy | - |
dc.source.uri | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403 | - |
dc.title | From Kantianism to aesthetic hedonism: aesthetic pleasure revised | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403 | - |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | McMahon, J. [0000-0002-2400-0166] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.