Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/105014
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, J.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Philosophical Review, 2017; 1(1):1-5-
dc.identifier.issn2474-0500-
dc.identifier.issn2474-0519-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/105014-
dc.description.abstractNo matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility that has been overshadowed by aestheticians’ more visible concerns. Here I briefly survey relevant strands in the literature over the past century, before introducing themes covered in this inaugural issue of Australasian Philosophical Review.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJennifer A. McMahon-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rights© 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy-
dc.source.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403-
dc.titleFrom Kantianism to aesthetic hedonism: aesthetic pleasure revised-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMcMahon, J. [0000-0002-2400-0166]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.