Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/105031
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Parallel multicentre randomised trial of a clinical trial question prompt list in patients considering participation in phase 3 cancer treatment trials
Author: Tattersall, M.H.N.
Jefford, M.
Martin, A.
Olver, I.
Thompson, J.F.
Brown, R.F.
Butow, P.N.
Citation: BMJ Open, 2017; 7(3):1-7
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Issue Date: 2017
ISSN: 2044-6055
2044-6055
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Martin H N Tattersall, Michael Jefford, Andrew Martin, Ian Olver, John F Thompson, Richard F Brown, Phyllis N Butow
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of a clinical trial question prompt list in patients considering enrolment in cancer treatment trials. Setting: Tertiary cancer referral hospitals in three state capital cities in Australia. Participants: 88 patients with cancer attending three cancer centres in Australia, who were considering enrolment in phase 3 treatment trials, were invited to enrol in an unblinded randomised trial of provision of a clinical trial question prompt list (QPL) before consenting to enrol in the treatment trial. Interventions: We developed and pilot tested a targeted QPL for patients with cancer considering clinical trial participation (the clinical trial QPL). Consenting patients were randomised to receive the clinical trial QPL or not before further discussion with their oncologist and/or trial nurse about the treatment trial. Primary and secondary outcomes: Questionnaires were completed at baseline and within 3â €..weeks of deciding on treatment trial participation. Main outcome measure: scores on the Quality of Informed Consent questionnaire (QuIC). Results: 88 patients of 130 sought for the study were enrolled (43 males), and 45 received the clinical trial QPL. 49% of trials were chemotherapy interventions for patients with advanced disease, 35% and 16% were surgical adjuvant and radiation adjuvant trials respectively. 70 patients completed all relevant questionnaires. 28 of 43 patients in the control arm compared with 39 of 45 patients receiving the clinical trial QPL completed the QuIC (p=0.0124). There were no significant differences in the QuIC scores between the randomised groups (QuIC part A p=0.08 and QuIC part B p=0.92). There were no differences in patient satisfaction with decisions or in anxiety levels between the randomised groups. Conclusions: Use of a question prompt list did not significantly change the QuIC scores in this randomised trial. ANZCTR 12606000214538 prospectively registered 31/5/2006. Trial registration number: Results, ACTRN12606000214538.
Keywords: Humans
Neoplasms
Biomedical Research
Informed Consent
Aged
Middle Aged
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Australia
Female
Male
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Tertiary Care Centers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Description: Accepted 9 February 2017
Rights: Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012666
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012666
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_105031.pdfPublished Version1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.