Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/105392
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGamlen, A.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationProgress in Human Geography: an international review of geographical work in the social sciences and humanities, 2014; 38(4):581-597-
dc.identifier.issn0309-1325-
dc.identifier.issn1477-0288-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/105392-
dc.description.abstractHuman geographers, and collaborators in cognate disciplines, have taken the lead in critiquing a wave of optimistic thinking about the relationship between migration and development that has emerged over the past two decades. This paper reviews and synthesizes recent human geographical and related critiques, arguing that they constitute a ‘new migration-and-development pessimism’, the main contentions of which are: (1) that the new optimism is not really new; (2) that it is partially driven by hidden political and economic agendas; and (3) that it is distorted by simplification and exaggeration.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAlan Gamlen-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2014-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512544-
dc.titleThe new migration-and-development pessimism-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0309132513512544-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Australian Population and Migration Research Centre publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_105392.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access216.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.