Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/105472
Type: Journal article
Title: 'The quality of mercy is not strained': the Norfolk Island mutineers and the exercise of the death penalty in colonial Australia 1824-1860
Author: Plater, D.
Milne, S.
Citation: Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society e-Journal, 2012; 2012:1-43
Publisher: Australasian Legal Information Institute
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 2207-4325
Statement of
Responsibility: 
David Plater and Sue Milne
Abstract: The exercise of the death penalty in England in the 19th century has long been a subject of academic scrutiny and popular interest. Scholars have also studied the role and importance of the prerogative of mercy in the context of the capital sanction. The exercise of both the death penalty and the prerogative of mercy, in comparison, in colonial Australia have been often overlooked. This article, which is part of a wider ongoing study, considers the rationale and operation of the prerogative of mercy in colonial Australia during the period 1824 to 1860. The focus is on those convicted of a capital offence in the Australian colonies, particularly convicts already serving a sentence for previous offences, and who, indeed, might also be a previous recipient of a pardon. The article considers the question of secondary punishment and the grant of mercy in respect of three notable incidences of mutiny and piracy at Norfolk Island in 1827, 1834 and 1842. This article argues that whilst there was manifest a strong theme of punishment and deterrence in the exercise of the death penalty, these were not the sole or even paramount considerations. Rather it is argued that the colonial authorities, even in relation to those offenders who were “beyond the pale” such as the Norfolk Island mutineers, took seriously the exercise of mercy in the context of emerging self-government. The implementation of the death penalty was not randomly administered, but was considered within the operation of the rule of law, where, as far as possible, even in respect of offenders of the “deepest dye”, “mercy seasons justice”.
Rights: Copyright status unknown
RMID: 0030065646
Published version: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ANZLawHisteJl/2012/1.html
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.