Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/105860
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, J.en
dc.contributor.authorAustin, J.en
dc.contributor.authorWeyrich, L.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationFEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2017; 93(2):207-1-207-8en
dc.identifier.issn0168-6496en
dc.identifier.issn1574-6941en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/105860-
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of physical evidence is typically a deciding factor in forensic casework by establishing what transpired at a scene or who was involved. Forensic geoscience is an emerging multi-disciplinary science that can offer significant benefits to forensic investigations. Soil is a powerful, nearly ‘ideal’ contact trace evidence, as it is highly individualistic, easy to characterise, has a high transfer and retention probability, and is often overlooked in attempts to conceal evidence. However, many real-life cases encounter close proximity soil samples or soils with low inorganic content, which cannot be easily discriminated based on current physical and chemical analysis techniques. The capability to improve forensic soil discrimination, and identify key indicator taxa from soil using the organic fraction is currently lacking. The development of new DNA sequencing technologies offers the ability to generate detailed genetic profiles from soils and enhance current forensic soil analyses. Here, we discuss the use of DNA metabarcoding combined with high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technology to distinguish between soils from different locations in a forensic context. Specifically, we provide recommendations for best practice, outline the potential limitations encountered in a forensic context and describe the future directions required to integrate soil DNA analysis into casework.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJ.M. Young, J.J. Austin and L.S. Weyrichen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.rights© FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comen
dc.subjectSoil; forensic; DNA; high-throughput sequencing; geoscienceen
dc.titleSoil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendationsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030070246en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/femsec/fiw207en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP34107393en
dc.identifier.pubid347561-
pubs.library.collectionGenetics publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Genetics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.