Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Interactions between nocturnal turbulent flux, storage and advection at an "ideal" eucalypt woodland site
Author: McHugh, I.
Beringer, J.
Cunningham, S.
Baker, P.
Cavagnaro, T.
MacNally, R.
Thompson, R.
Citation: Biogeosciences, 2017; 14(12):3027-3050
Publisher: Copernicus Publications
Issue Date: 2017
ISSN: 1726-4170
Statement of
Ian D. McHugh, Jason Beringer, Shaun C. Cunningham, Patrick J. Baker, Timothy R. Cavagnaro, Ralph Mac Nally, and Ross M. Thompson
Abstract: While the eddy covariance technique has become an important technique for estimating long-term ecosystem carbon balance, under certain conditions the measured turbulent flux of CO₂ at a given height above an ecosystem does not represent the true surface flux. Profile systems have been deployed to measure periodic storage of CO₂ below the measurement height, but have not been widely adopted. This is most likely due to the additional expense and complexity and possibly also the perception, given that net storage over intervals exceeding 24 h is generally negligible, that these measurements are not particularly important. In this study, we used a 3-year record of net ecosystem exchange of CO₂ and simultaneous measurements of CO₂ storage to ascertain the relative contributions of turbulent CO₂ flux, storage, and advection (calculated as a residual quantity) to the nocturnal CO₂ balance and to quantify the effect of neglecting storage. The conditions at the site are in relative terms highly favourable for eddy covariance measurements, yet we found a substantial contribution (∼40 %) of advection to nocturnal turbulent flux underestimation. The most likely mechanism for advection is cooling-induced drainage flows, the effects of which were observed in the storage measurements. The remaining ∼ 60 % of flux underestimation was due to storage of CO₂. We also showed that substantial underestimation of carbon uptake (approximately 80 gC m⁻² a⁻¹, or 25 % of annual carbon uptake) arose when standard methods (u∗ filtering) of nocturnal flux correction were implemented in the absence of storage estimates. These biases were reduced to approximately 40–45 gC m⁻² a⁻¹ when the filter was applied over the entire diel period, but they were nonetheless large relative to quantifiable uncertainties in the data. Neglect of storage also distorted the relationships between the CO₂ exchange processes (respiration and photosynthesis) and their key controls (light and temperature respectively). We conclude that the addition of storage measurements to eddy covariance sites with all but the lowest measurement heights should be a high priority for the flux measurement community.
Description: Published: 22 June 2017
Rights: © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
RMID: 0030072198
DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-3027-2017
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_107022.pdfPublished version4.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.