Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/107096
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElena, G.en
dc.contributor.authorSosnowski, M.en
dc.contributor.authorAyres, M.en
dc.contributor.authorLecomte, P.en
dc.contributor.authorBenetreau, C.en
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Figueres, F.en
dc.contributor.authorLuque, J.en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationPhytopathologia Mediterranea, 2015; 54(2):345-354en
dc.identifier.issn0031-9465en
dc.identifier.issn1593-2095en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/107096-
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the infection rates of different spore inoculum doses of the grapevine trunk pathogens Diplodia seriata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata following artificial inoculation of pruning wounds. Potted vines of cv. Tempranillo were inoculated with doses ranging from 10 to 4000 conidia per wound of D. seriata and P. chlamydospora and led to recovery percentages of 10–100% for D. seriata and 16–94% for P. chlamydospora. Eutypa lata, when inoculated onto wounds of vines in a mature vineyard (cv. Shiraz) and on detached canes (cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) with a dose range of 10 to 1000 ascospores per wound, led to recovery percentages of 17–95%. In the field assay, there was no difference in recovery from wounds that were exposed to single or double inoculations with the same total spore dose, or between canes that were harvested 7 or 11 months after inoculation. The results obtained in this study showed significant variability in pathogen recovery between trials, comparable with that reported previously, which suggests that factors such as pathogen virulence, environmental parameters and experimental conditions may influence the infection process. According to this study, in order to obtain optimal recovery percentages of 50–70% for robust evaluation of pruning wound treatments, dose ranges of 100-1000 conidia of D. seriata, 100–2000 conidia of P. chlamydospora, and 100–500 ascospores of E. lata per wound would be required.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGeorgina Elena, Mark R. Sosnowski, Matthew R. Ayres, Pascal Lecomte, Celine Benetreau, Francesc Garcia-Figueres, Jordi Luqueen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUnione Fitopatologica Mediterraneaen
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY- 4.0)en
dc.subjectDiplodia seriata; Phaeomoniella chlamydospora; Eutypa lata; artificial inoculations; inoculum doses; epidemiologyen
dc.titleEffect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning woundsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030040680en
dc.identifier.doi10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16010en
dc.identifier.pubid216331-
pubs.library.collectionEnvironment Institute publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Environment Institute publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_107096.pdfPublished Version639.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.