Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107329
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The importance of soil carbon and nitrogen for amelioration of acid sulphate soils
Author: Michael, P.
Fitzpatrick, R.
Reid, R.
Citation: Soil Use and Management, 2016; 32(1):97-105
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 0266-0032
1475-2743
Editor: Goss, M.
Statement of
Responsibility: 
P. S. Michael, R. W. Fitzpatrick, R. J. Reid
Abstract: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When exposed to air and adequate moisture, soils containing sulphides (sulphidic soils with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content> &gt; 4) become oxidized and generate sulphuric acid to form ‘sulphuric soils’ (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content> &lt; 4). Treatment of this acidity is undertaken by addition of lime. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of adding plant organic matter, and simple carbon and nitrogen compounds, as alternatives to lime to sulphuric and sulphidic soils. In sulphuric soils under aerobic conditions, organic matter increased <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content>, the extent depending on the nitrogen content. Lucerne hay, which had the largest nitrogen content, increased the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content> from 3.7 to 8.0, while pea straw and wheat straw effected smaller changes, in proportion to their respective nitrogen contents. Lucerne hay also caused the greatest reductions in soil redox potential and sulphate content, consistent with the action of sulphate‐reducing bacteria. Similarly, incorporation of organic matter under aerobic conditions effectively prevented sulphidic soil acidification and reduced the redox potential and sulphate content. The individual effects of carbon and nitrogen compounds were then examined and compared to plant organic material. Glucose was ineffective at both small and large concentrations, while molasses increased the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content> slightly to 4.6 and acetate to 5.9. None of these carbon compounds was as effective as complex organic matter. Nitrogen added alone as nitrate or ammonia had little or no effect on <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content>, whereas organic nitrogen in the form of urea caused the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">pH</jats:styled-content> to rise to 6.3 and reduced the redox to less than 0 mV but had no significant effect on sulphate content.</jats:p>
Keywords: Acidity; acid sulphate soils; simple carbon and nitrogen; complex organic matter; redox potential; acidity control; bioremediation
Rights: © 2015 British Society of Soil Science
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12239
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12239
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest 8

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.