Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology
Author: Varker, T.
Forbes, D.
Dell, L.
Weston, A.
Merlin, T.
Hodson, S.
O'Donnell, M.
Citation: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2015; 21(6):1199-1204
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 1356-1294
Statement of
Tracey Varker, David Forbes, Lisa Dell, Adele Weston, Tracy Merlin, Stephanie Hodson and Meaghan O'Donnell
Abstract: Rationale, aims and objectives: Within the field of evidence-based practice, policy makers, health care professionals and consumers require timely reviews to inform decisions on efficacious health care and treatments. Rapid evidence assessment (REA), also known as rapid review, has emerged in recent years as a literature review methodology that fulfils this need. It highlights what is known in a clinical area to the target audience in a relatively short time frame. Methods: This article discusses the lack of transparency and limited critical appraisal that can occur in REA, and goes on to propose general principles for conducting a REA. The approach that we describe is consistent with the principles underlying systematic review methodology, but also makes allowances for the rapid delivery of information as required while utilizing explicit and reproducible methods at each stage. Results: Our method for conducting REA includes: developing an explicit research question in consultation with the end-users; clear definition of the components of the research question; development of a thorough and reproducible search strategy; development of explicit evidence selection criteria; and quality assessments and transparent decisions about the level of information to be obtained from each study. In addition, the REA may also include an assessment of the quality of the total body of evidence. Conclusions: Transparent reporting of REA methodologies will provide greater clarity to end-users about how the information is obtained and about the trade-offs that are made between speed and rigour.
Keywords: Methods development; rapid evidence assessment; rapid review; review methodology
Rights: © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12405
Grant ID:
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.