Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Reflecting on Hannah Arendt and Eichman in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil|
|Citation:||Adelaide Law Review, 2014; 35(2):427-447|
|Publisher:||Adelaide Law Review|
|Peter Burdon, Gabrielle Appleby, Rebecca LaForgia, Joe McIntyre and Ngaire Naffine|
|Abstract:||In this essay, we offer a modern legal reading of Hannah Arendt’s classic book, Eichmann in Jerusalem. First we provide a brief account of how Arendt came to write Eichmann in Jerusalem and explain her central arguments and observations. We then consider the contemporary relevance of Arendt’s work to us as legal academics engaged with a variety of problems arising from our times. We consider Arendt’s writing of Eichmann in Jerusalem as a study in intellectual courage and academic integrity, as an important example of accessible political theory, as challenging the academic to engage in participatory action, and as informing our thinking about judgement when we engage in criminal law reform. Finally, we consider the role of Arendt’s moral judgement for those within government today and how it defends and informs judgement of the modern bureaucrat at a time of heightened government secrecy.|
|Keywords:||Hannah Arendt; Eichmann; Legal Theory; Criminal Law; International Law|
|Rights:||Copyright Status Unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||Law publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.