Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107707
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Vendors' statements, the right to cool off and remedies: Le Cornu and Kurda v Place on Brougham Pty Ltd |
Author: | Babie, P. |
Citation: | Property Law Review, 2014; 4:143-145 |
Publisher: | Thomson Reuters |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
ISSN: | 1838-3858 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Paul T. Babie |
Abstract: | Le Cornu and Kurda v Place on Brougham Pty Ltd [2013] SADC 32 confirms that a Vendor’s Statement is not invalid due solely to the non-existence of the property the subject of such statement. Yet, once a Vendor’s Statement is rendered invalid on other grounds, the right to cool off remains open, allowing the purchaser a choice between electing to affirm or rescission. In either case, though, the vendor retains the right to claim estoppel. |
Keywords: | Real property; vendor's statements; right to cool off |
Description: | Research paper |
Rights: | Copyright status unknown |
Published version: | https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2607397 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 3 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.