Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/108309
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCullity, G.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 2016; 173(12):3399-3411-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116-
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/108309-
dc.description.abstractThis critical study of John Broome’s Rationality Through Reasoning (i) raises some questions about the various requirements of rationality Broome formulates, pointing out some apparent gaps and counterexamples; (ii) proposes a general description of rationality that is broadly consistent with Broome’s requirements while providing them with a unifying justification, filling the gaps, and removing the counterexamples; and (iii) presents two objections to the book’s broader argument concerning the nature and importance of reasoning.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGarrett Cullity-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016-
dc.subjectRationality; reasoning; reasons; normativity; rule-following; intention-
dc.titleDescribing rationality-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11098-016-0717-0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCullity, G. [0000-0003-4847-4304]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108309.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access249.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.