Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHope, A.-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 2016; 37(7):885-904-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years the proliferation, speed and reach of school-based surveillance devices has undergone what could be labelled as a revolution. Drawing upon Foucault’s concept of biopower to explore the disciplining of bodies and the biopolitical management of populations, this paper examines ‘new’ school surveillance technologies enabling biometric measurement, electronic detection, substance screening, video observation and data monitoring. Klein’s notion of surveillance 2.0 is utilised to further examine emerging features of school monitoring practices, including the impact of ‘data doubles’, playful student resistance and the commodification of surveillance. It is concluded that invasive school surveillance practices are becoming normalised, that politically motivated, data-driven simulations could increasingly be used to support education interventions and that a function creep is occurring as recreational devices become embroiled in institutional surveillance practices.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAndrew Hope-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.rights© 2015 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group-
dc.subjectBiopower; discipline; biopolitics; body; data; resistance-
dc.titleBiopower and school surveillance technologies 2.0-
dc.typeJournal article-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Education publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access414.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.