Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYengin, D.-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Choice and Welfare, 2017; 48(1):81-108-
dc.description.abstractWe study the problem of allocating heterogeneous indivisible tasks in a multi-object-demand model (i.e., each agent can be assigned multiple objects) where monetary transfers are allowed. Agents’ costs for performing tasks are their private information and depend on what other tasks they are obtained with. First, we show that when costs are unrestricted or superadditive, then there is no envy-free and egalitarian-equivalent mechanism that assigns the tasks efficiently. Then, we characterize the class of envy-free and egalitarian-equivalent Groves mechanisms when costs are subadditive. Finally, within this class, under a bounded-deficit condition, we identify the Pareto-dominant subclass. We show that the mechanisms in this subclass are not Pareto-dominated by any other Groves mechanism satisfying the same bounded-deficit condition.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDuygu Yengin-
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016-
dc.titleNo-envy and egalitarian-equivalence under multi-object-demand for heterogeneous objects-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidYengin, D. [0000-0001-6848-111X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access512.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.