Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarkusen, J.-
dc.contributor.authorStähler, F.-
dc.identifier.citationReview of World Economics, 2011; 147(2):195-215-
dc.description.abstractModels dealing with cross-border acquisitions versus greenfield investment usually assume that the entry of a foreign firm into a market has effects on the outputs of all domestic firms in that market, but exit or entry of local firms is not considered. The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the acquisition versus greenfield versus exporting question under fixed versus free entry assumptions for local firms. Our finding is that greenfield entry and exporting options are more attractive relative to acquisition when the local market structure adjusts to foreign entry through local entry or exit than when it is fixed. With respect to welfare in the host economy, existing theory models and policy discussions maintain that the effects of greenfield versus acquisition entry differ substantially. We show that under free entry and exit, there is no difference between the two for consumer surplus, but acquisition improves welfare a little through rent extraction by the local acquired firm. Thus the existing conventional wisdom may be leading to inappropriate policy choices by host governments.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJames Markusen, Frank Stähler-
dc.rights© Kiel Institute 2010-
dc.subjectCross-border acquisitions; foreign direct investment; multinational firms; endogenous market structures-
dc.titleEndogenous market structure and foreign market entry-
dc.typeJournal article-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access445.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.