Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/109272
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, G.en
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.citationCommon Law World Review, 2002; 31(1):62-102en
dc.identifier.issn1473-7795en
dc.identifier.issn1740-5556en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/109272-
dc.description.abstractSouth Australia, like England and the two largest Australian States of New South Wales and Victoria, retains the common law of crime, merely modifying various aspects of it, as the need arises, by statute. There has been only one serious attempt to codify the common law of crime in South Australia. Early in the twentieth century, a draft Criminal Code was produced by an Anglo-Irish lawyer who had been Professor of Laws at the University of Adelaide. Although the draft was commissioned by the government of South Australia, that government took no steps towards its enactment. Analysing the primary sources, this article shows that the failure of the Code was due to inertia on the part of the government rather than any serious defects in the Code itself (as Castles proposes). The legislative process is not well adapted to considering lengthy codes, and the political process is too oriented towards short-term goals rather than the long-term benefits which are thought to flow from codification.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGreg Tayloren
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSage Publishingen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2002, © SAGE Publicationsen
dc.titleDr Pennefather’s Criminal Code for South Australiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/147377950203100103en
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, G. [0000-0002-9393-9134]en
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.