Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/110884
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGray, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMcDowell, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, M.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, M.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Herpetology, 2017; 51(3):375-382en
dc.identifier.issn0022-1511en
dc.identifier.issn1937-2418en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/110884-
dc.description.abstractThe jaws of lizards commonly occur in Quaternary fossil deposits and have the potential to inform our understanding of recent changes in climate and environment. Frequently, however, interpretation of their taxonomic affinity is difficult because of either a lack of morphological characters and identifications or ones which are sometimes no more than subjective visual comparisons. Here, we evaluate the taxonomic affinity of a maxilla from the Holocene of Kelly Hill Caves (Kangaroo Island, South Australia) by comparing it to a sample of modern agamid lizards using computer models generated from X-ray computed tomography data and three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. To represent the shape of the maxilla, we used 22 fixed landmarks and 30 semi-landmarks placed at equivalent points on the three-dimensional surface files of the maxillae. Procrustes distances show that, with respect to overall shape difference, the fossil does not closely resemble Ctenophorus decresii, which is the only agamid currently present on Kangaroo Island. Preliminary comparisons to other candidate agamid taxa from southeastern Australia suggest instead that the fossil is most similar to Amphibolurus muricatus and Amphibolurus norrisi and least similar to Tympanocryptis lineata. Geometric morphometrics show promise as a more objective means of quantifying and characterizing shape differences. Reliable identifications, however, require sufficient specimen collections to adequately represent within-species variation (including ontogenetic variation).en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJaimi A. Gray, Mathew C. McDowell, Mark N. Hutchinson and Marc E.H. Jonesen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSociety for the Study of Amphibians and Reptilesen
dc.rightsCopyright 2017 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptilesen
dc.titleGeometric morphometrics provides an alternative approach for interpreting the affinity of fossil lizard jawsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030074155en
dc.identifier.doi10.1670/16-145en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE130101567en
dc.identifier.pubid366902-
pubs.library.collectionEcology, Evolution and Landscape Science publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.