Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/111191
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, J.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationThe Palgrave Kant Handbook, 2017 / Altman, M. (ed./s), Ch.19, pp.425-446en
dc.identifier.isbn1137546557en
dc.identifier.isbn9781137546555en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/111191-
dc.description.abstractKant’s aesthetic theory is misinterpreted when understood in terms of uncritical empiricism. By analyzing standard interpretations of Kant’s aesthetic formalism, McMahon argues that the meaning of direct/immediate and non-cognitive judgment is distorted when taken out of the context of Kant’s critical system of the mind. She concludes by drawing out the implications for understanding Kant’s aesthetic theory in the contemporary context.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJennifer A. McMahonen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPalgrave Handbooks in German Idealismen
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2017en
dc.source.urihttps://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9781137546555en
dc.titleImmediate judgment and non-cognitive ideas: The pervasive and persistent in the misreading of Kant’s Aesthetic formalismen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.identifier.rmid0030079258en
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/978-1-137-54656-2_19en
dc.publisher.placeUKen
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143en
dc.identifier.pubid291019-
pubs.library.collectionPhilosophy publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS03en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMcMahon, J. [0000-0002-2400-0166]en
Appears in Collections:Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.