Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/111194
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Theses
Title: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence on non-pharmacological interventions in the management of dental anxiety: a linked series of systematic reviews
Author: Moola, Sandeep
Issue Date: 2017
School/Discipline: School of Public Health
Abstract: Background: Dental anxiety has been identified as a significant and common problem in both children and adults and is considered an obstacle in the provision of quality dental care by dental care providers. It is reported that one in six adults suffer from some form of dental anxiety and in children the prevalence estimates range between 5.7% and 19.5%. Patients with dental anxiety tend to neglect dental care which poses a problem for both dentists and patients. Dental anxiety has long been recognised as a source of serious problem in providing dental services to the patients. Terms such as dental fear, dental phobia, and dental anxiety are often used synonymously and do not have agreed clinical definitions. Dental anxiety leading to avoidance of dental treatment is common and appears to be associated strongly with clinically significant deterioration of oral and dental health. Pain or fear of pain is a known primary source of anxiety, as well as a major obstacle to seeking dental care. Dental injection was found to be the most powerful anxiety-provoking stimulus, followed by the dental drill and the sight and sensation of a dental local anaesthetic injection. Strategies for managing dental anxiety include, but are not limited to: explanation of the treatment procedure, pharmacological strategies involving the use of benzodiazepines and antidepressants, biofeedback, hypnosis, behavioural interventions and relaxation. Medications provide only short term cost effective solutions; but there are few long term benefits with a greater rate of relapse, and an increased patient risk due to the potential for serious drug interactions or overdose. Behavioural management is found to be superior to anxiolytic drug therapy, and dentally anxious patients report that they prefer non-pharmacological interventions. No comprehensive systematic reviews exist encompassing all pharmacological non-pharmacological managements for dental anxiety in paediatric and adult patients undergoing various dental treatments/procedures in various dental settings. The series of reviews aimed to identify and synthesise the best available evidence on all non-pharmacological interventions for managing dental anxiety in paediatric and adult patients in dental situations. Objectives: The overall objective of this series of systematic reviews was to identify and synthesise the best available effective, meaningful and/or appropriate evidence on all non-pharmacological interventions in the management of DA and dental fear in paediatric and adult patients. Review methods: The series of systematic reviews included both paediatric patients from any young age and adult patients of all age groups. The reviews excluded people with special needs and disabled people. All non-pharmacological interventions were examined. The primary outcome of interest was dental anxiety and other outcomes such as pain, dental avoidance and satisfaction were only reported if data on dental anxiety was reported. All types of study designs were considered for inclusion in the review. Results: Overall, 288 studies were included in the series of reviews that examined various non-pharmacological interventions. There was moderate to strong evidence for interventions such as aromatherapy, atraumatic restorative treatment, audiovisual including music and imagery, behaviour management techniques, utilisation of new technology, hypnosis and cognitive behaviour therapy. Most of the behaviourally oriented treatments included components based on systematic desensitisation, modelling, guided imagery and use of relaxation to weaken the fear response during gradual exposure to treatment and alleviate dental anxiety. Dental anxiety management should be considered an integral part of clinical practice, as the prevalence is high but goes unrecognised. Interventions should be tailored according to patients’ needs considering their degree of anxiety, age, and cooperation. In addition, dentists should take into account their own experience and expertise, and the clinical context. Overall, patients with mild to moderate dental anxiety can be non-pharmacologically managed using various psychotherapeutic interventions. However, in cases of high levels of dental anxiety and/or dental phobia a combination of non-pharmacological management approaches can be utilised. Implications for practice: Based on the available evidence, a summary of recommendations is provided along with clinical decision making algorithms to manage dental anxiety in patients. Implications for research: Reviewed evidence suggests that there is no need to conduct further studies on the majority of the interventions as there is enough evidence base to support their use. However, research on the feasibility aspect is lacking for many of these interventions and there is a lack of research in this field on how to implement these interventions in time poor settings as some of the advanced non-pharmacological techniques require time, effort, training and involve costs both to the dental practitioner and the patient.
Advisor: Pearson, Alan
Mejia, Gloria Cecilia
Armfield, Jason
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, 2017
Keywords: dental anxiety
dental fear
dental phobia
paediatric
adults
non-pharmacological
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
DOI: 10.4225/55/5ab43b8433545
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf540.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf5.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
PermissionsLibrary staff access only388.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
RestrictedLibrary staff access only6.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.