Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/111518
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Testing a model of facilitated reflection on network feedback: a mixed method study on integration of rural mental health care services for older people
Author: Fuller, J.
Oster, C.
Muir-Cochrane, E.
Dawson, S.
Lawn, S.
Henderson, J.
O'Kane, D.
Gerace, A.
McPhail, R.
Sparkes, D.
Fuller, M.
Reed, R.L.
Citation: BMJ Open, 2015; 5(11):e008593-1-e008593-11
Publisher: BMJ Journals
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 2044-6055
2044-6055
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Jeffrey Fuller, Candice Oster, Eimear Muir Cochrane, Suzanne Dawson, Sharon Lawn, Julie Henderson, Deb O, Kane, Adam Gerace, Ruth McPhail, Deb Sparkes, Michelle Fuller, Richard L Reed
Abstract: Objective: To test a management model of facilitated reflection on network feedback as a means to engage services in problem solving the delivery of integrated primary mental healthcare to older people. Design: Participatory mixed methods case study evaluating the impact of a network management model using organisational network feedback (through social network analysis, key informant interviews and policy review). Intervention: A model of facilitated network reflection using network theory and methods. Setting: A rural community in South Australia. Participants: 32 staff from 24 services and 12 senior service managers from mental health, primary care and social care services. Results: Health and social care organisations identified that they operated in clustered self-managed networks within sectors, with no overarching purposive older people’s mental healthcare network. The model of facilitated reflection revealed service goal and role conflicts. These discussions helped local services to identify as a network, and begin the problem-solving communication and referral links. A Governance Group assisted this process. Barriers to integrated servicing through a network included service funding tied to performance of direct care tasks and the lack of a clear lead network administration organisation. Conclusions: A model of facilitated reflection helped organisations to identify as a network, but revealed sensitivity about organisational roles and goals, which demonstrated that conflict should be expected. Networked servicing needed a neutral network administration organisation with cross-sectoral credibility, a mandate and the resources to monitor the network, to deal with conflict, negotiate commitment among the service managers, and provide opportunities for different sectors to meet and problem solve. This requires consistency and sustained intersectoral policies that include strategies and funding to facilitate and maintain health and social care networks in rural communities.
Keywords: Humans
Problem Solving
Community Mental Health Services
Models, Organizational
Health Policy
Community Networks
Aged
Rural Population
Rural Health Services
Referral and Consultation
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
South Australia
Rights: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008593
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_111518.pdfPublished version1.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.