Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Republican democracy and compulsory voting|
|Citation:||Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2015; 18(6):652-660|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Abstract:||In this article, I focus on Chapters 4 and 5 of On the People’s Terms, chapters that deal with democratic influence and control. I take an applied political science approach to how Pettit’s republic might be practically achieved by exploring the under-appreciated capacity of elections to mobilise the resistance-prone, contestatory public upon which his republicanism depends. Whereas Pettit tends to focus on public contestation between elections and only demands that the public has the opportunity to vote when elections are held, I argue that they should be given a more prominent role within his republic and further, that access to voting is not enough: rather, citizens should actually vote. In order to ensure that participation is socially inclusive and that the public’s attempts at influence are ‘individualised’, ‘unconditioned’ and ‘efficacious’ in the manner Pettit desires, I suggest that compulsory voting should be a major pillar of his republicanism.|
|Keywords:||Elections; compulsory voting; inclusiveness; influence; control|
|Rights:||© 2015 Taylor & Francis|
|Appears in Collections:||Politics publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.