Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018; 2018(4):CD012504-1-CD012504-19||en|
|dc.description||Publication status and date: New, published in Issue 4, 2018. (Pub 2)||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Background: Identification of the causes of stillbirth is critical to the primary prevention of stillbirth and to the provision of optimal care in subsequent pregnancies. A wide variety of investigations are available, but there is currently no consensus on the optimal approach. Given their cost and potential to add further emotional burden to parents, there is a need to systematically assess the effect of these interventions on outcomes for parents, including psychosocial outcomes, economic costs, and on rates of diagnosis of the causes of stillbirth. Objectives: To assess the effect of different tests, protocols or guidelines for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth on outcomes for parents, including psychosocial outcomes, economic costs, and rates of diagnosis of the causes of stillbirth. Search methods: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (31 August 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (15 May 2017). Selection criteria: We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs. We planned to include studies published as abstract only, provided there was sufficient information to allow us to assess study eligibility. We planned to exclude cross-over trials. Participants included parents (including mothers, fathers, and partners) who had experienced a stillbirth of 20 weeks' gestation or greater. This review focused on interventions for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth. Such interventions are likely to be diverse, but could include: * review of maternal and family history, and current pregnancy and birth history; * clinical history of present illness; * maternal investigations (such as ultrasound, amniocentesis, antibody screening, etc.); * examination of the stillborn baby (including full autopsy, partial autopsy or noninvasive components, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerised tomography (CT) scanning, and radiography); * umbilical cord examination; * placental examination including histopathology (microscopic examination of placental tissue); and * verbal autopsy (interviews with care providers and support people to ascertain causes, without examination of the baby). We planned to include trials assessing any test, protocol or guideline (or combinations of tests/protocols/guidelines) for investigating the causes of stillbirth, compared with the absence of a test, protocol or guideline, or usual care (further details are presented in the Background, see Description of the intervention). We also planned to include trials comparing any test, protocol or guideline (or combinations of tests/protocols/guidelines) for investigating the causes of stillbirth with another, for example, the use of a limited investigation protocol compared with a comprehensive investigation protocol. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed trial eligibility independently. Main results: We excluded five studies that were not RCTs. There were no eligible trials for inclusion in this review. Authors' conclusions: There is currently a lack of RCT evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth. Seeking to determine the causes of stillbirth is an essential component of quality maternity care, but it remains unclear what impact these interventions have on the psychosocial outcomes of parents and families, the rates of diagnosis of the causes of stillbirth, and the care and management of subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth. Due to the absence of trials, this review is unable to inform clinical practice regarding the investigation of stillbirths, and the specific investigations that would determine the causes. Future RCTs addressing this research question would be beneficial, but the settings in which the trials take place, and their design, need to be given careful consideration. Trials need to be conducted with the utmost care and consideration for the needs, concerns, and values of parents and families. Assessment of longer-term psychosocial variables, economic costs to health services, and effects on subsequent pregnancy care and outcomes should also be considered in any future trials.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Aleena M Wojcieszek, Emily Shepherd, Philippa Middleton, Glenn Gardener, David A Ellwood, Elizabeth M McClure, Katherine J Gold, Teck Yee Khong, Robert M Silver, Jan Jaap HM Erwich, Vicki Flenady||en|
|dc.rights||Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.||en|
|dc.title||Interventions for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Shepherd, E. [0000-0002-9669-788X]||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Middleton, P. [0000-0002-8573-338X]||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Khong, T. [0000-0002-2404-007X]||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Paediatrics publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.