Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - the WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/112789

Scopus	Web of Science®	Altmetric
Citations
?	?

Type:	Journal article
Title:	Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - the WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)
Author:	Maru, S. Byrnes, J. Carrington, M. Chan, Y. Thompson, D. Stewart, S. Scuffham, P.
Citation:	International Journal of Cardiology, 2015; 201:368-375
Publisher:	Elsevier Ireland
Issue Date:	2015
ISSN:	0167-5273 1874-1754
Statement of Responsibility:	Shoko Maru, Joshua Byrnes, Melinda J. Carrington, Yih-Kai Chan, David R. Thompson, Simon Stewart, Paul A. Scuffham, on behalf of the WHICH? Trial Investigators
Abstract:	Abstract not available
Keywords:	Heart failure; disease management; cost effectiveness; net monetary benefit; economic evaluation
Rights:	© 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI:	10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.066
Published version:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.066
Appears in Collections:	Aurora harvest 3 Medicine publications

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Show full item record

Adelaide Research & Scholarship