Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/113081
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGray, S.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, P.-
dc.contributor.authorFleig, L.-
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, P.-
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, M.-
dc.contributor.authorPuyat, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSims-Gould, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, H.-
dc.contributor.authorWinters, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAshe, M.-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physical Activity and Health, 2018; 15(6):411-416-
dc.identifier.issn1543-3080-
dc.identifier.issn1543-5474-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/113081-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Physical activity confers many health benefits to older adults, and adopting activity into daily life routines may lead to better uptake. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of a lifestyle intervention to increase daily physical activity in older women through utilitarian walking and use of public transportation. Methods: In total, 25 inactive women with mean age (SD) of 64.1 (4.6) years participated in this pilot randomized controlled trial [intervention (n = 13) and control (n = 12)]. Seven-day travel diaries (trips per week) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes per week) were collected at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Results: At 3 months, intervention participants reported 9 walking trips per week and 643.5 minutes per week of active transportation, whereas control participants reported 4 walking trips per week and 49.5 minutes per week of active transportation. Adjusting for baseline values, there were significant group differences favoring Everyday Activity Supports You for walking trips per week [4.6 (0.5 to 9.4); P = .04] and active transportation minutes per week [692.2 (36.1 to 1323.5); P = .05]. At 6 months, significant group differences were observed in walking trips per week [6.1 (1.9 to 11.4); P = .03] favoring the intervention (9 vs 2 trips per week). Conclusion: Given these promising findings, the next step is to test Everyday Activity Supports You model’s effectiveness to promote physical activity in older women within a larger study.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySamantha M. Gray, Peggy Chen, Lena Fleig, Paul A. Gardiner, Megan M. McAllister, Joseph H. Puyat, Joanie Sims-Gould, Heather A. McKay, Meghan Winters, and Maureen C. Ashe-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics Publishers-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0348-
dc.subjectactive transport-
dc.subjectenvironment-
dc.subjectolder adults-
dc.subjectintervention study-
dc.titleCan a lifestyle intervention increase active transportation in women aged 55-70 years? Secondary outcomes from a pilot randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/jpah.2016-0348-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1000986-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidAshe, M. [0000-0002-6820-4435]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.