Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/113381
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorde Zwart, Melissa-
dc.contributor.advisorRichards, Bernadette-
dc.contributor.authorZito, Paula Caroline-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/113381-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the worth of using food Geographical Indications (GIs) on food products to make an origin claim in the context of a sui generis food GI system. It assesses the value of using a sui generis food GI system to protect the connection between Australian regional food and origin and to protect the assets that Australia has in Australian regional names as identifiers of authentic regional food products that have a clear and strong connection with Australian regions. This assessment is made against a background of significant and original fieldwork carried out in Italy and South Australia. Since 1992, Italy has operated under a sui generis food GI system as provided for in the European Union Regulation EU No. 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (EU–Italian food GI system). Italy currently has 294 food GI registrations, the highest number of food GI registrations in the European Union (EU). Therefore, Italy was the ideal case study to determine the worth of a food GI system. Interviews were conducted with a variety of food producers and agricultural industry-based organisations and GI Consortiums as part of the Italian fieldwork. The overall aim and objective of the Italian fieldwork was to determine the effectiveness of the EU–Italian food GI system in protecting the connection between food and origin and the lessons that could be learned from the EU–Italian food GI system in considering implementation of a sui generis food GI system in Australia. The Italian fieldwork revealed that a sui generis food GI system was an effective legal framework to protect the connection between food and origin. It provided valuable insight into the elements required for a successful food GI system. The overall aim and objective of the South Australian fieldwork was to determine whether the interviewees considered that Australia should implement a sui generis food GI system. Interviews were conducted with regional food producers based in the South Australian regions of the Barossa Valley and Adelaide Hills, as well as other representatives of the South Australian food industry, as part of the South Australian fieldwork. The South Australian fieldwork revealed that regional food producers based in the Barossa Valley and the Adelaide Hills were interested in a sui generis food GI system. The South Australian fieldwork provided valuable insight into the elements that the regional food producers considered necessary for a successful Australian food GI system. Against the backdrop of this significant and original fieldwork, this thesis recommends that Australia implement a sui generis food GI system to overcome the deficiencies of current consumer protection, passing off and trademark laws that inadequately regulate the connection between food and origin. This thesis explains that a sui generis food GI system is not only important for Australia at a national level, it is also crucial at an international level.en
dc.subjectGeographical indicationsen
dc.subjectregional brandingen
dc.subjectregional branding lawsen
dc.subjectfood labellingen
dc.subjectfood labelling lawsen
dc.subjectconnection between regional food and originen
dc.subjectintellectual propertyen
dc.subjectinternational tradeen
dc.subjectagrifooden
dc.titleGeographical indications: what is their worth? A comparison of geographical indication registrations between Australia and Italyen
dc.typeThesesen
dc.contributor.schoolAdelaide Law Schoolen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legalsen
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Adelaide Law School, 2018en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zito2018PhD.pdf7.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.