Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Brain size/body weight in the dingo (Canis dingo): comparisons with domestic and wild canids|
|Citation:||Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018; 65(5):292-301|
|Publisher:||Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Publishing|
|Bradley P. Smith, Teghan A. Lucas, Rachel M. Norris and Maciej Henneberg|
|Abstract:||Endocranial volume was measured in a large sample (n = 128) of free-ranging dingoes (Canis dingo) where body size was known. The brain/body size relationship in the dingoes was compared with populations of wild (Family Canidae) and domestic canids (Canis familiaris). Despite a great deal of variation among wild and domestic canids, the brain/body size of dingoes forms a tight cluster within the variation of domestic dogs. Like dogs, free-ranging dingoes have paedomorphic crania; however, dingoes have a larger brain and are more encephalised than most domestic breeds of dog. The dingo’s brain/body size relationship was similar to those of other mesopredators (medium-sized predators that typically prey on smaller animals), including the dhole (Cuon alpinus) and the coyote (Canis latrans). These findings have implications for the antiquity and classification of the dingo, as well as the impact of feralisation on brain size. At the same time, it highlights the difficulty in using brain/body size to distinguish wild and domestic canids.|
|Keywords:||Brain; Canidae; domestication; encephalisation; feralisation|
|Rights:||Copyright in the product is the property of CSIRO and others and is subject to all applicable intellectual property rights. The Licencee has the right to make one backup copy of the product.|
|Appears in Collections:||Zoology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.