Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Journal of Business Economics, 2019; 89(3):291-325||en|
|dc.description.abstract||Real Option analyses are broadly discussed in economics and finance and differ- ent analytic and numeric calculation methods for option values have been presented and successfully implemented in theoretical case studies and practical applications. However, real option analysis has not yet been applied for mandatory investments without monetary revenues, e.g. investments in pollution reduction and emission control installations in large industrial plants enforced by political regulation. The assessment of the timing of the investment, i.e. whether to invest immediately or to delay the investment in the future, is the main scope of this work. A difficulty of the underlying type of investments with regard to option valuation is that not to invest is not an option. Therefore, the frequently applied optimal stopping approaches based on investment thresholds are not applicable to this work. In the first part of the paper, specific features and characteristics of the regarded investments are analyzed and translated into financial terms of option valuation, accompanied by an overview of several relevant option valuation methods. The most appropriate methodology for the application, the Monte-Carlo-Analysis, will be assessed in more detail. Based on a two perspectives approach that analyzes possible savings and losses of a delayed investment, a case study displays the calculations and results of the developed meth- odology in several scenarios. The case study reveals possible influences of policy schemes and the impact of the degree of uncertainty on mandatory investments. The work has a strong methodological focus and the calculation methodology provided can be of use for investors and policy-makers, particularly with regard to investment decision-making in the real options framework and the design of political instru- ments such as funding schemes.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Carmen Schiel, Simon Glöser-Chahoud, Frank Schultmann||en|
|dc.rights||© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018||en|
|dc.subject||Real option analysis; Monte-Carlo-Simulation; emission abatement; investment decision; environmental investment||en|
|dc.title||A real option application for emission control measures||en|
|pubs.library.collection||Business School publications||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Business School publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.