Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/115501
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrackenridge, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBradnam, L.en
dc.contributor.authorLennon, S.en
dc.contributor.authorCosti, J.en
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, D.en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationNeuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, 2016; 4(1):25-42en
dc.identifier.issn2213-3852en
dc.identifier.issn2213-3860en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/115501-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stroke is a major contributor to the reduced ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) post cerebral infarct. There has been a major focus on understanding and improving rehabilitation interventions in order to target cortical neural plasticity to support recovery of upper limb function. Conventional therapies delivered by therapists have been combined with the application of mechanical and robotic devices to provide controlled and assisted movement of the paretic upper limb. The ability to provide greater levels of intensity and reproducible repetitive task practice through the application of intervention devices are key mechanisms to support rehabilitation efficacy. Results: This review of literature published in the last decade identified 141 robotic or mechanical devices. These devices have been characterised and assessed by their individual characteristics to provide a review of current trends in rehabilitation device interventions. Correlation of factors identified to promote positive targeted neural plasticity has raised questions over the benefits of expensive robotic devices over simple mechanical ones. Conclusion: A mechanical device with appropriate functionality to support the promotion of neural plasticity after stroke may provide an effective solution for both patient recovery and to stimulate further research into the use of medical devices in stroke rehabilitation. These findings indicate that a focus on simple, cost effective and efficacious intervention solutions may improve rehabilitation outcomes.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJacob Brackenridge, Lynley V. Bradnam, Sheila Lennon, John J. Costi and David A. Hobbsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBentham Science Publishersen
dc.rights© 2016 Bentham Science Publishersen
dc.subjectActivities of daily living; exercise therapy, paresis; recovery of function; robotics; stroke; upper extremity; mechanical device; neural plasticityen
dc.titleA review of rehabilitation devices to promote upper limb function following strokeen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030085531en
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/2213385204666160303220102en
dc.identifier.pubid400157-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.