Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/115538
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRusso, P.L.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, G.-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, A.C.-
dc.contributor.authorRichards, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGraves, N.-
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHall, L.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open, 2016; 6(5):e011397-1-e011397-8-
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/115538-
dc.description.abstractObjective To identify key stakeholder preferences and priorities when considering a national healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance programme through the use of a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Setting Australia does not have a national HAI surveillance programme. An online web-based DCE was developed and made available to participants in Australia. Participants A sample of 184 purposively selected healthcare workers based on their senior leadership role in infection prevention in Australia. Primary and secondary outcomes A DCE requiring respondents to select 1 HAI surveillance programme over another based on 5 different characteristics (or attributes) in repeated hypothetical scenarios. Data were analysed using a mixed logit model to evaluate preferences and identify the relative importance of each attribute. Results A total of 122 participants completed the survey (response rate 66%) over a 5-week period. Excluding 22 who mismatched a duplicate choice scenario, analysis was conducted on 100 responses. The key findings included: 72% of stakeholders exhibited a preference for a surveillance programme with continuous mandatory core components (mean coefficient 0.640 (p<0.01)), 65% for a standard surveillance protocol where patient-level data are collected on infected and non-infected patients (mean coefficient 0.641 (p<0.01)), and 92% for hospital-level data that are publicly reported on a website and not associated with financial penalties (mean coefficient 1.663 (p<0.01)). Conclusions The use of the DCE has provided a unique insight to key stakeholder priorities when considering a national HAI surveillance programme. The application of a DCE offers a meaningful method to explore and quantify preferences in this setting.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPhilip L Russo, Gang Chen, Allen C Cheng, Michael Richards, Nicholas Graves, Julie Ratcliffe, Lisa Hall-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBMJ Journals-
dc.rights© Article author(s)(or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011397-
dc.subjectCross Infection-
dc.titleNovel application of a discrete choice experiment to identify preferences for a national healthcare-associated infection surveillance programme: a cross-sectional study-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011397-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1030103-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1068732-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1059565-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidRatcliffe, J. [0000-0001-7365-1988]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_115538.pdfPublished version923.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.