Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/115736
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system–based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses
Author: Keegan, K.G.
Wilson, D.A.
Kramer, J.
Reed, S.K.
Yonezawa, Y.
Maki, H.
Pai, P.F.
Lopes, M.A.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research, 2013; 74(1):17-24
Publisher: American Veterinary Medical Association
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0002-9645
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kevin G. Keegan, David A. Wilson, Joanne Kramer, Shannon K. Reed, Yoshiharu Yonezawa, Hiromitchi Maki, P. Frank Pai, Marco A. F. Lopes
Abstract: Objective—To compare data obtained with an inertial sensor system with results of subjective lameness examinations performed by 3 experienced equine veterinarians for evaluation of lameness in horses. Animals—106 horses. Procedures—Horses were evaluated for lameness with a body-mounted inertial sensor system during trotting in a straight line and via subjective evaluation by 3 experienced equine practitioners who performed complete lameness examinations including lunging in a circle and limb flexion tests. Agreement among evaluators regarding results of subjective evaluations and correlations and agreements between various inertial sensor measures and results of subjective lameness evaluations were determined via calculation of Fleiss’ k statistic, regression analysis, and calculation of 95% prediction intervals. Results—Evaluators agreed on classification of horses into 3 mutually exclusive lameness categories (right limb lameness severity greater than left limb lameness severity, left limb lameness severity greater than right limb lameness severity, or equal right and left limb lameness severity) for 58.8% (k = 0.37) and 54.7% (k = 0.31) of horses for forelimb and hind limb lameness, respectively. All inertial sensor measures for forelimb and hind limb lameness were positively and significantly correlated with results of subjective evaluations. Agreement between inertial sensors measures and results of subjective evaluations was fair to moderate for forelimb lameness and slight to fair for hind limb lameness. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results of lameness evaluation of horses with an inertial sensor system and via subjective lameness examinations were significantly correlated but did not have strong agreement. Inertial sensor-based evaluation may augment but not replace subjective lameness examination of horses.
Rights: © American Veterinary Medical Association
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17
Appears in Collections:Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications
Aurora harvest 3

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.