Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/116132
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTo, T.H.M.-
dc.contributor.authorTait, P.-
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, D.-
dc.contributor.authorTieman, J.-
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, G.B.-
dc.contributor.authorMichelmore, A.-
dc.contributor.authorCurrow, D.-
dc.contributor.authorSwetenham, K.-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Primary Health, 2017; 23(5):458-463-
dc.identifier.issn1448-7527-
dc.identifier.issn1836-7399-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/116132-
dc.description.abstractBenefits of case conferencing for people with palliative care needs between a general practitioner, the person and other key participants include improving communication, advance care planning, coordination of care, clarifying goals of care and support for patient, families and carers. Despite a growing evidence base for the benefits, the uptake of case conferencing has been limited in South Australia. The aim of this study is to explore the beliefs and practice of South Australian general practitioners towards case conferencing for people with palliative care needs. Using an online survey, participants were asked about demographics, attitudes towards case conferencing and details about their most recent case conference for a person with palliative care needs. Responses were received from 134 general practitioners (response rate 11%). In total, 80% valued case conferencing for people with palliative care needs; however, <25% had been involved in case conferencing in the previous 2 years. The major barrier was time to organise and coordinate case conferences. Enablers included general practitioner willingness or interest, strong relationship with patient, specialist palliative care involvement and assistance with organisation. Despite GPs’ beliefs of the benefits of case conferencing, the barriers remain significant. Enabling case conferencing will require support for organisation of case conferences and review of Medicare Benefits Schedule criteria for reimbursement.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityTimothy H. M. To, Paul Tait, Deidre D. Morgan, Jennifer J. Tieman, Gregory Crawford, Alexandra Michelmore, David C. Currow and Kate Swetenham-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing-
dc.rights© La Trobe University 2017-
dc.subjectCase conference; family meeting; patient care team; primary health care-
dc.titleCase conferencing for palliative care patients – a survey of South Australian general practitioners-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/PY16001-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidCrawford, G.B. [0000-0001-7347-8855]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.